This month we are looking at process in some areas besides collaborative work. We are looking at other fields where you have a choice to focus on content or focus on process, to see if valuing process works in those fields. This week we are looking at cooking.

I am not a professional chef. There was one break point in my career when I might have taken that route. I was recently widowed, disillusioned with my job, and looking for a new direction. I consulted a career coach who administered the Strong Interest Survey. It had one question on cooking: “Do you enjoy experimenting with recipes?” I answered “no.” I don’t play with recipes. Recipes are about content. My cooking is all about process. But because I answered “no” to the only cooking question, the career coach did not recommend that I become a chef.

My stepdaughter bakes with a food scale. She doesn’t measure ingredients, she weighs them. It is a much faster and more accurate way of cooking, and it allows her to keep up with the demand of baking all her own bread, pie crusts, pasta, and pizza crust.

I don’t  use a food scale. I like the process of spooning the flour into the measuring cup and leveling it off – I have a particular spoon and measuring cup, a King Arthur Flour dough cutter I use for leveling, and a collection of special storage canisters that are sized to allow the process without spilling – of measuring the water, of stopping the mixing to test the consistency of the dough, adding a pinch more floor or a teaspoon more water to get it just right. I am really into the process, my daughter wants to get the content right the first time and move on.

I am working on a book entitled How to Survive the Loss of a Chef. For a while I was bogged down by not knowing what recipes to put in the book. I finally realized I’m not writing a book of what to put into dishes, I’m writing a book on how to become competent and confident in the kitchen. I’m writing a book on how to teach yourself process in keeping with the tenets of last week’s blog on teaching.

Over twenty years ago, when my sons were still in college and contemplating going out on their own, I heard an interview on NPR with the author of a cookbook. The author told the story about his bread salad recipe coming under fire from the food critics. An authentic bread salad has 27 ingredients, his recipe only had four. His response was that he was trying to teach a novice cook the process of making bread salad. Once that was mastered, the apprentice chef could gradually add more content until they reached the canonical form of bread salad.
 
I bought each of my sons a copy of his book.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This month we are looking at process in some areas besides collaborative work. We are looking at other fields where you have a choice to focus on content or focus on process, to see if valuing process works in those fields. This week we are looking at prayer. Praying seems to be almost ubiquitous. Even Buddhists, who don’t believe in a deity who is a being, pray. Who are they praying to? No one. Then why are they praying? Carl Jung says that there is a part of the psyche that needs to deal with the spiritual, the divine, the ineffable. “It doesn’t matter whether God created that part of the psyche or that part of the psyche created God, we ignore that part or our psyche at the risk of our mental and emotional health.” Prayer is the process of paying attention to that part of our psyche. The content of the prayer perhaps doesn’t matter. If you believe in a deity that has a physical reality and is capable of affecting physical reality, you may pray certain content, for ph
Read more
This month we are going to look at process in some areas besides collaborative work. We are going to look at other fields where you have a choice to focus on content or focus on process, to see if valuing process works in those fields. This week we are looking at the writing process, particularly the process of writing fiction. I recently completed my first novel. (Actually, at 42,000 words, some would call it a novelette.) It deals with the healing process after rape. It is the only novel I have been able to find (with my admittedly weak research skills) in which the victim is the main character, not simply a pawn in a chess game between the perp and the criminal justice system. When I was writing the story, I took the advice of Ann Lamott, Erica Jong, and many other writers and let my character tell her story. I was surprised when she told me a story of rape and healing. No woman chooses to be raped. I asked my character why she chose to tell me a story of rape. She said th
Read more
Tomorrow, Earth Day, will see Marches for Science in many parts of the country. I hope to march myself on our Niantic Bay Boardwalk. Science has its own set of process values that are very much like those of collaborative work. The scientific method is all about how we treat evidence and inference as we look at natural and experimental observations and try to understand something about our Universe. The one value that sometimes seems to be missing from science is how we treat one another in the process. In fact, both historical and fictionalized accounts of scientific debate are rank with stories of scientists criticizing, attacking, and demonizing those who don’t agree with them. The source of this is the same as the source of most human conflict: positions. Once you take a position on anything, including scientific theories, you cannot allow for the possibility of the other position. The whole March for Science movement we will celebrate tomorrow is a perfect case in poin
Read more